Could we geoengineer the climate with CO2?

Schemes for artificially cooling the planet can often seem wild and woolly. The latest such geoengineering scheme is no different: it involves frozen carbon dioxide, Antarctica and a whole lot of freezers. While the proposal is not as daft as it sounds, the numbers may not stack up.

Ernest Agee and colleagues of Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, propose installing gigantic freezers in the heart of Antarctica, where temperatures are already tens of degrees below zero. Once the air inside the freezers is cooled to -140 ?C, the carbon dioxide within it will freeze out as "CO₂ snow". The solid CO₂ could then be stored underground.

Agee's calculations suggest that it would be possible to remove 1 billion tonnes of CO₂ per year this way, using the energy provided by 16 wind farms, each generating 1200 megawatts of electricity. "There's a lot of wind energy in the Antarctic," Agee says.

Our annual greenhouse gas emissions reached 33 billion tonnes of CO₂ in 2010, and are likely to keep rising for years to come, so Agee's proposal would only go so far. The sheer scale of our emissions is a problem for similar concepts for sucking CO₂ out of the air, such as fertilising the ocean with iron.

Feasible?

Their calculations are also rather optimistic, says Tim Kruger of the Oxford Geoengineering Programme at the University of Oxford. For instance, they assume that the power plants are 100 per cent efficient, which is impossible.

Furthermore, CO₂ makes up only slightly less than 400 parts per million of the atmosphere. This means for every volume of carbon dioxide that gets frozen, Agee would have to cool 2500 volumes of air ? so a lot of the energy used would be wasted.

It will also be difficult to store the CO₂ once it is frozen. Either it will have to be permanently cooled below its freezing point, which means running the freezers forever, or the CO₂ will have to be stored in sealed chambers that can withstand intense pressure once it warms up and expands.

"This is not really a credible solution," Kruger says.

Journal reference: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, doi.org/h86

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say

Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.

Only personal subscribers may leave comments on this article

Subscribe now to comment.

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Source: http://feeds.newscientist.com/c/749/f/10897/s/2319ee6d/l/0L0Snewscientist0N0Carticle0Cdn222440Ecould0Ewe0Egeoengineer0Ethe0Eclimate0Ewith0Eco20Bhtml0DDCMP0FOTC0Erss0Gnsref0Fonline0Enews/story01.htm

winning lotto numbers lottery tickets mega lottery sag aftra mega mill power ball april fools pranks